Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGinevičius, Romualdas
dc.contributor.authorGedvilaitė, Dainora
dc.contributor.authorStasiukynas, Andrius
dc.contributor.authorSuhajda, Karel
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T16:12:33Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T16:12:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1785-8860
dc.identifier.other(SCOPUS_ID)85121649111
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/112360
dc.description.abstractThe commercial success of businesses depends to a large extent on the ability to quantify the current situation at the desired point in time. It helps to make the right strategic development decisions and reveals weaknesses. The state of development of a company is a complex phenomenon, therefore, it can be described only by a certain number of indicators. They are multidimensional and of unequal importance, therefore, multiple-criteria methods are used to combine their values into one generalising quantity. They rely to a large extent on expert assessments to determine the weights of indicators, as well as the values of indicators that are difficult to formalise. An integral part of such assessments is the examination of the consistency of expert opinions. Existing methods for determining the level of consistency of expert assessment are intended to determine the importance of indicator weights, and it is not possible to determine the consistency of expert assessment of indicator values on their basis. This is because, when determining the importance of an indicator, the estimate of the importance of one indicator follows from the context of the importance of all other indicators, whereas in the second case, the value of each indicator is determined separately, i.e., it does not follow from the context of the values of the other indicators. In order to determine the consistency of the expert assessment of the values of indicators, it is necessary to calculate the actual and maximum possible level of uniformity or non-uniformity of the assessment. The consistency of the expert assessment will be demonstrated by the ratio of these values. The aim of the article is to propose and approve a methodology for determining the compatibility of expert assessment of the values of difficult-to-formalize indicators that increase the commercial success and competitiveness of business enterprises.eng
dc.format.extentp. 135-150
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScience Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)
dc.titleComplex expert assessment of the state of business enterprises
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.references39
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus kolegija
dc.contributor.institutionKazimiero Simonavičiaus universitetas
dc.contributor.institutionBrno University of Technology
dc.contributor.facultyVerslo vadybos fakultetas / Faculty of Business Management
dc.subject.researchfieldS 004 - Ekonomika / Economics
dc.subject.researchfieldS 003 - Vadyba / Management
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfieldsEV02 - Aukštos pridėtinės vertės ekonomika / High Value-Added Economy
dc.subject.ltspecializationsL103 - Įtrauki ir kūrybinga visuomenė / Inclusive and creative society
dc.subject.enbusiness enterprises
dc.subject.enmultiple-criteria methods
dc.subject.encompatibility of expert assessments
dcterms.sourcetitleActa Polytechnica Hungarica
dc.description.issueiss. 2
dc.description.volumevol 19
dc.publisher.nameBudapest Tech Polytechnical Institution
dc.publisher.cityBudapest
dc.identifier.doi2-s2.0-85121649111
dc.identifier.doi85121649111
dc.identifier.doi000734894900008
dc.identifier.elaba115457034


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record