| dc.contributor.author | Motuzienė, Violeta | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rogoža, Artur | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lapinskienė, Vilūnė | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vilutienė, Tatjana | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-18T16:33:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-18T16:33:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0959-6526 | |
| dc.identifier.other | (BIS)VGT02-000031438 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/114887 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Improvements in the design of energy efficient houses lead to the increase of environmental impact in construction and demolition phases, creating a need to investigate the use of construction materials more carefully. The approach presented herein is based on a complex system of criteria that allows performing comprehensive evaluation of the alternative design solutions. This article presents a case study which illustrates the proposed approach. In this study we estimate the environmental impacts of three alternative types of envelopes (masonry, log and timber frame) of an energy efficient single-family house, simultaneously identifying the most rational alternative according to the considered criteria (reduction of expenses, non-renewable primary energy, Green House Gases and ozone layer depletion). Results of the life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis are evaluated by the multi-criteria decision analysis method and criteria weights of impact categories are determined by the analytic hierarchy process method. The results obtained with the life cycle assessment and life cycle cost show that in the case of buildings, which are designed according to the passive house requirements, the share of the embodied input and output flows in the whole life cycle generally constitutes more than 1/3. | eng |
| dc.format | PDF | |
| dc.format.extent | p. 532-541 | |
| dc.format.medium | tekstas / txt | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | FLUIDEX | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | GEOBASE | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Scopus | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) | |
| dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.103 | |
| dc.subject | AE03 - Pastatų aprūpinimas energija, jos vartojimo būdai, sistemos ir procesai / Building of energy supply, it’s application methods, systems and processes | |
| dc.title | Construction solutions for energy efficient single-family house based on its life cycle multi-criteria analysis: a case study | |
| dc.type | Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB | |
| dcterms.references | 39 | |
| dc.type.pubtype | S1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Aplinkos inžinerijos fakultetas / Faculty of Environmental Engineering | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Statybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering | |
| dc.subject.researchfield | T 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering | |
| dc.subject.researchfield | T 006 - Energetika ir termoinžinerija / Energy and thermoengineering | |
| dc.subject.ltspecializations | L102 - Energetika ir tvari aplinka / Energy and a sustainable environment | |
| dc.subject.ltspecializations | C101 - Civilinės inžinerijos mokslo centras / | |
| dc.subject.en | Sustainable development | |
| dc.subject.en | Energy efficiency | |
| dc.subject.en | Life cycle assessment | |
| dc.subject.en | SimaPro | |
| dc.subject.en | MCDA | |
| dc.subject.en | Life cycle costs | |
| dcterms.sourcetitle | Journal of cleaner production | |
| dc.description.issue | Part. 1 | |
| dc.description.volume | Vol. 112 | |
| dc.publisher.name | Elsevier | |
| dc.publisher.city | Oxford | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 000368206700055 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.103 | |
| dc.identifier.elaba | 15331883 | |