Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPetrović, Goran S.
dc.contributor.authorMadić, Miloš
dc.contributor.authorAntuchevičienė, Jurgita
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T17:12:32Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T17:12:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0957-4174
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/120677
dc.description.abstractThe selection of an optimal, efficient and reliable transport and logistics policy is one of the most important factors in supply chain management and logistics planning. Given that decision making in transport and logistics involves the consideration of a number of opposite criteria and possible solutions, such a selection can be considered as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. This study presents a new integrated approach to decision making, i.e. the generation of a robust decision making rule (RDMR) by combining different MCDM methods and Taguchi’s robust quality engineering principles. As a logical implication of the proposed approach, a conceptual model of an adaptive and interactive expert system is developed. Its purpose is to enhance the decision making process through enabling the decision maker to: (i) use higher level knowledge regarding the selection of criteria weights and MCDM methods, (ii) estimate the ranking of a new alternative, which can be added to the initial decision matrix after a posteriori analysis of the final rankings of alternatives, and, moreover, quantify its distance from the ideal and the anti-ideal solution. Five different case studies in the field of transport and logistics were considered in order to illustrate the proposed approach. The obtained results and the results of the other MCDM methods were compared using Kendall’s tau-b and Spearman’s rho tests. An analysis of the final rank stability with respect to the changes in criteria weights was also performed so as to assess the sensitivity of the alternative rankings obtained by the application of different MCDM methods and the proposed approach. To this aim, the Monte Carlo simulation was conducted covering 1000 different scenarios of criteria weights in three different cases. Finally, an additional procedure was introduced for an explicit representation of an RDMR using the design of experiments (DOE) principles.eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 263-276
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbySciSearch
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScience Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)
dc.relation.isreferencedbyCurrent Contents / Engineering, Computing & Technology
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.065
dc.source.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417418302227
dc.subjectTD04 - Transporto ir logistikos technologijos, transporto rūšių sąveika / Transport and logistics technology, interaction of transport modes
dc.titleAn approach for robust decision making rule generation: solving transport and logistics decision making problems
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.references55
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Niš
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 007 - Informatikos inžinerija / Informatics engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 003 - Transporto inžinerija / Transport engineering
dc.subject.ltspecializationsL106 - Transportas, logistika ir informacinės ir ryšių technologijos (IRT) / Transport, logistic and information and communication technologies
dc.subject.enMCDM
dc.subject.enTransport and logistics
dc.subject.enSignal-to-noise ratio
dc.subject.enExpert system
dc.subject.enDecision rule
dc.subject.enRobust engineering
dcterms.sourcetitleExpert systems with applications
dc.description.volumeVol. 106
dc.publisher.nameElsevier
dc.publisher.cityOxford
dc.identifier.doi2-s2.0-85045567438
dc.identifier.doi000434239200020
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.065
dc.identifier.elaba27900939


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record