Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.contributor.authorMartinelli, Dario
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T17:14:43Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T17:14:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2039-6635
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/121146
dc.description.abstractThe present article presents a theoretical model for analyzing the question of aesthetic behavior in animals (including humans), starting from a problematization of its definition, based on five approaches (from ethology, aesthetics, philosophy, linguistics and semiotics) and continuing with the hypothesis that aesthetics can be explained by starting from the development of deceptive and playing abilities, the three phenomena operating along some kind of continuum. In order to defend this thesis, the article focuses on the perceptive dimension (i.e., the role of the receiver of the deceptive/playful/aesthetic message) and the articulation of the message (i.e., the role of the sender of the deceptive/playful/aesthetic message). The latter in particular demands explanation in terms of the messages' interaction and their reciprocal necessity.eng
dc.description.abstractContinuamente incontriamo il medesimo paradosso estetico: ciò nasce da una profonda confusione riguardo agli intenti dell’arte, e ci porta necessariamente a scoprire un’apparenza di utilità, generalmente definita come valore adattivo. Troviamo difficile concepire l’arte come una parte integrante della vita degli animali e riusciamo appena a immaginarla come prodotto decorativo del loro tempo libero. Tutte le ricerche in questo campo sono segnate da una tensione tra la profonda convinzione di molti illustri biologi che l’attività artistica esiste davvero nel mondo animale e l’incapacità di far fronte alla sua presunta mancanza di importanza, o perfino inutilità. .ita
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 403-420
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoita
dc.relation.isreferencedbyThe Philosopher's Index
dc.relation.isreferencedbyERIH Plus
dc.source.urihttps://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.14648/91851
dc.source.urihttps://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:33667044/datastreams/COVER/content
dc.subjectaesthetics
dc.subjectcommunication
dc.subjectzoosemiotics
dc.subjectdeception
dc.subjectplay Behavior
dc.subjectarts
dc.titleReflections for a zoosemiotic interpretation of aesthetics
dc.title.alternativeRiflessioni per una interpretazione zoosemiotica dell’estetica
dc.typeStraipsnis kitoje DB / Article in other DB
dcterms.references0
dc.type.pubtypeS3 - Straipsnis kitoje DB / Article in other DB
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyKūrybinių industrijų fakultetas / Faculty of Creative Industries
dc.subject.researchfieldS 008 - Komunikacija ir informacija / Communication and information
dc.subject.researchfieldH 003 - Menotyra / Art studies
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfieldsEV04 - Komunikacijos valdymas įtraukioje ir kūrybingoje visuomenėje / Communication management in inclusive and creative society
dc.subject.ltspecializationsL103 - Įtrauki ir kūrybinga visuomenė / Inclusive and creative society
dc.subject.encommunication
dc.subject.enarts
dc.subject.enaesthetics
dc.subject.enzoosemiotics
dc.subject.endeception
dc.subject.enplay behavior
dcterms.sourcetitleEstetica. Studi e ricerche
dc.description.issueno. 2
dc.description.volumevol. 8
dc.publisher.nameIl Mulino
dc.publisher.cityBologna
dc.identifier.doi10.14648/91851
dc.identifier.elaba33667044


Šio įrašo failai

FailaiDydisFormatasPeržiūra

Su šiuo įrašu susijusių failų nėra.

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą