Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.contributor.authorHashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz
dc.contributor.authorYazdani, Morteza
dc.contributor.authorZavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T17:38:01Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T17:38:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1432-7643
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/124463
dc.description.abstractThe process of criteria prioritization and weighting is an important part of multiple attributes decision making. The most frequently applied multi-attribute decision-making weighting tools include analytical hierarchy process, stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis, factor relationship, and best–worst method. When policies are at the core of decision making, stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis method is the most efficient method for criteria evaluation. It involves two important steps: the first is to prioritize the criteria by consulting experts, while the second is the weighting process. This research seeks to extend stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis to improve the quality of the decision-making process by incorporating the reliability evaluation of experts’ idea into the first step. Such a component is absent from the first step in all other similar models. Thus, an extended version of stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis can be applied for such evaluation. To test the applicability and performance of the proposed method, a numerical example from an earlier study was used. The proposed version can replace the classic version in future studies as an improved method in decision-making area.eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 7399-7405
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbyConference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (Web of Science)
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScience Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbyINSPEC
dc.relation.isreferencedbyZentralblatt MATH (zbMATH)
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3092-2
dc.titleAn extended stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method for improving criteria prioritization process
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.accessRightsMulti-Criteria Decision-Making: advances in theory and applications - an introduction to the special issue
dcterms.references46
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionAmirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidad Europea de Madrid
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentTvariosios statybos institutas / Institute of Sustainable Construction
dc.subject.researchfieldT 007 - Informatikos inžinerija / Informatics engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfieldsSD0404 - Statinių skaitmeninis modeliavimas ir tvarus gyvavimo ciklas / BIM and Sustainable lifecycle of the structures
dc.subject.ltspecializationsL102 - Energetika ir tvari aplinka / Energy and a sustainable environment
dc.subject.enMultiple attributes decision making (MADM)
dc.subject.enStepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA)
dc.subject.enExtended SWARA
dc.subject.enPrioritizing the criteria
dc.subject.enWeighting criteria
dcterms.sourcetitleSoft computing
dc.description.issueiss. 22
dc.description.volumevol. 22
dc.publisher.nameSpringer
dc.publisher.cityBerlin
dc.identifier.doi000448418300008
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00500-018-3092-2
dc.identifier.elaba32415233


Šio įrašo failai

FailaiDydisFormatasPeržiūra

Su šiuo įrašu susijusių failų nėra.

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą