| dc.contributor.author | Jurkevičius, Vaidas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pokhodun, Yuliia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-18T17:42:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-18T17:42:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/125204 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In the light of modern commercial relationships, the doctrine of apparent authority plays an important role in ensuring the sustainability of business. Where the business undertaking is a large and complex one, it would be difficult and inconvenient for a person or legal entity to communicate every transaction with the agent. Thus, an agent’s effective powers in dealing with third parties may extend to transactions that he was not authorized to undertake by the principal. Such situations are usually characterized as apparent authority. The difficulty with this type of authority lies in the lack of control on the part of the principal which entails certain questions of liability of either the agent or the principal. Even though the third party has to check the agent’s authority, he cannot know about all the details of the agent’s internal authorization. Therefore, there is always a risk that the agent was not authorized to act. This article is deemed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the doctrine of apparent authority from a comparative perspective. A conclusion is made that the doctrine is an efficient mean of apportioning the risk of liability for agent’s unauthorized act between the principal and the third party with individual factors determining who must bear liability it in every specific case. | eng |
| dc.format | PDF | |
| dc.format.extent | p. 649-661 | |
| dc.format.medium | tekstas / txt | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Scopus | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science) | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | EconBiz | |
| dc.source.uri | https://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/15550 | |
| dc.title | The doctrine of apparent authority as a precondition for sustainable business | |
| dc.type | Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB | |
| dcterms.accessRights | CC BY | |
| dcterms.references | 37 | |
| dc.type.pubtype | S1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Mykolo Romerio universitetas Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Mykolo Romerio universitetas | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Verslo vadybos fakultetas / Faculty of Business Management | |
| dc.subject.researchfield | S 001 - Teisė / Law | |
| dc.subject.researchfield | S 003 - Vadyba / Management | |
| dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfields | EV03 - Dinamiškoji vadyba / Dynamic Management | |
| dc.subject.ltspecializations | L103 - Įtrauki ir kūrybinga visuomenė / Inclusive and creative society | |
| dc.subject.en | agent | |
| dc.subject.en | unauthorized agency | |
| dc.subject.en | apparent authority | |
| dc.subject.en | manifestations of authority | |
| dc.subject.en | estoppel doctrine | |
| dc.subject.en | sustainable business | |
| dcterms.sourcetitle | Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues | |
| dc.description.issue | no. 2 | |
| dc.description.volume | vol. 6 | |
| dc.publisher.name | Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center | |
| dc.publisher.city | Vilnius | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 000453377400013 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 2-s2.0-85060469181 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(13) | |
| dc.identifier.elaba | 33155869 | |