Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAntuchevičienė, Jurgita
dc.contributor.authorZavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
dc.contributor.authorZakarevičius, Algimantas
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T17:44:39Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T17:44:39Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1392-8619
dc.identifier.other(BIS)VGT02-000020848
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/125820
dc.description.abstractDecision making in construction management has been always complicated especially if there were more than one criterion under consideration. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) has been often applied for complex decisions in construction when a lot of criteria were involved. Traditional MCDM methods, however, operate with independent and conflicting criteria. While in every day problems a decision maker often faces interactive and interrelated criteria. Accordingly, the need of improving and supplementing the methodology of compromise decisions arose. It was proposed to supplement TOPSIS (Technique for the Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method and integrate the Mahalanobis distance in the usual algorythm of TOPSIS. Mahalanobis distance measure offered an option to take the correlations between the criteria into considerations while making the decision. A case study of building redevelopment in Lithuanian rural areas was presented that demonstrated the application of the proposed methodology. The case study proved that the proposed TOPSIS-M (TOPSIS applying Mahalanobis distance measure) method could have substantial influence in carrying the proper decision.eng
dc.description.abstractStatybos valdymo spendimų priėmimas visuomet yra komplikuotas, ypač jei turime atsižvelgti į daugelį rodiklių. Kompleksiniams statybos sprendimams, kurie apibūdinami daugeliu rodiklių, taikomi daugiatiksliai sprendimų priėmimo metodai (MCDM – Multiple Criteria Decision Making). Šie metodai skirti sprendimams priimti tuomet, kai vertinami konfliktuojantys bei nepriklausomi rodikliai. Tačiau realiose situacijose, priešingai, nuolat susiduriame su sąveikaujančiais ir tarpusavio priklausomybę turinčiais rodikliais. Dėl šios priežasties kyla poreikis patobulinti sprendimų metodologiją. Straipsnyje siūloma papildyti variantų racionalumo nustatymo metodą TOPSIS (Technique for the Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), taikant Mahalanobio metodą atstumams nustatyti. Mahalanobio atstumų nustatymo metodas suteikia galimybę įvertinti koreliacines rodiklių priklausomybes priimant daugiatikslį sprendimą. Siūlomos metodologijos taikymas iliustruojamas sprendžiant apleistų pastatų Lietuvos kaimo vietovėse racionalaus sutvarkymo uždavinį. Pateiktas pavyzdys patvirtina, kad TOPSIS-M metodo (t. y. TOPSIS naudojant Mahalanobio atstumą) taikymas gali turėti esminę įtaką priimant sprendimą.lit
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 109-125
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbySocial Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science)
dc.relation.isreferencedbyICONDA
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.source.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3846/tede.2010.07
dc.titleMultiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.references48
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyAplinkos inžinerijos fakultetas / Faculty of Environmental Engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldS 004 - Ekonomika / Economics
dc.subject.researchfieldT 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 010 - Matavimų inžinerija / Measurement engineering
dc.subject.ltStatybos valdymas
dc.subject.ltMCDM
dc.subject.ltTOPSIS
dc.subject.ltTOPSIS-M
dc.subject.ltRodikliai
dc.subject.ltKoreliacija
dc.subject.ltKovariacija
dc.subject.ltEuklido atstumas
dc.subject.ltMahalanobio atstumas
dc.subject.enConstruction management
dc.subject.enMCDM
dc.subject.enTOPSIS
dc.subject.enTOPSIS-M
dc.subject.enCriteria
dc.subject.enCorrelation
dc.subject.enCovariance
dc.subject.enEuclidean distance
dc.subject.enMahalanobis distance
dcterms.sourcetitleTechnological and economic development of economy: Baltic journal on sustainability
dc.description.issueno. 1
dc.description.volumeVol. 16
dc.publisher.nameTechnika
dc.publisher.cityVilnius
dc.identifier.doi000274831100007
dc.identifier.doi10.3846/tede.2010.07
dc.identifier.elaba3902708


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record