Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.contributor.authorPamucar, Dragan
dc.contributor.authorChatterjee, Kajal
dc.contributor.authorZavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T18:35:40Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T18:35:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0360-8352
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/129683
dc.description.abstractThird-party logistics (3PL) has involved a significant response among researchers and practitioners in the recent decade. In the global competitive scenario, multinational companies (MNCs) not only improve quality of service and increase efficiency, but also decrease costs by means of 3PL. However, the assessment and selection of 3PL is a very critical decision, comprising intricacy due to the existence of various imprecisely based criteria. Also, uncertainty is an unavoidable part of the information in the decision-making process and its importance in the selection process is relatively high and needs to be carefully considered. Consequently, incomplete and inadequate data or information may occur among other various selection criteria, which can be termed as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. Interval rough numbers are very flexible to model this type of uncertainty occurring in MCDM problems. Thus this paper presents a new integrated interval rough number (IRN) approach based on the Best Worst Method (BWM) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method along Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) to evaluate 3PL providers. The hybrid IRN-BWM based methodology is used for computing the priority weights of criteria while IRN-WASPAS and IRN-MABAC are employed to achieve the final ranking of 3PL providers. A computational study is performed to illustrate the proposed approaches along with a sensitivity analysis on different sets of criteria weight coefficient values to validate the stability of the suggested methodology. Consequently, a comparative analysis of the obtained ranking results with their crisp and fuzzy counterparts is also conducted for checking the reliability of the proposed approach. The results display stability in ranking of alternative results and prove the feasibility of the proposed approach to handle MCDM problems with IRNs.eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 383-407
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbyPASCAL/CNRS
dc.relation.isreferencedbyCompendex
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScience Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.023
dc.titleAssessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.references83
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Defence
dc.contributor.institutionNational Institute of Technology
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 007 - Informatikos inžinerija / Informatics engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfieldsSD0404 - Statinių skaitmeninis modeliavimas ir tvarus gyvavimo ciklas / BIM and Sustainable lifecycle of the structures
dc.subject.ltspecializationsL106 - Transportas, logistika ir informacinės ir ryšių technologijos (IRT) / Transport, logistic and information and communication technologies
dc.subject.enThird-party logistics (3Pl.)
dc.subject.enInterval rough numbers (IRNs)
dc.subject.enWASPAS method
dc.subject.enMABAC method
dc.subject.enBWM method
dc.subject.enMulti-criteria decision making (MCDM)
dcterms.sourcetitleComputers & industrial engineering
dc.description.volumevol. 127
dc.publisher.nameElsevier
dc.publisher.cityOxford
dc.identifier.doi000460708800030
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.023
dc.identifier.elaba35822898


Šio įrašo failai

FailaiDydisFormatasPeržiūra

Su šiuo įrašu susijusių failų nėra.

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą