Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorŠaparauskas, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorZavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
dc.contributor.authorTurskis, Zenonas
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T18:41:19Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T18:41:19Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1648-715X
dc.identifier.other(BIS)VGT02-000022883
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/130749
dc.description.abstractAn appropriate mechanism for supporting design management practices at an early stage of project is crucial in terms of adding value over scope, time and total investment strategic decisions. The clients are not only interested in value for money in relation to the investment in project development but costs associated in operation and maintenance over project life cycle as well. These criteria make possible to evaluate design solutions which can be characterized by quantitative and qualitative criteria which possibly have different weight, dimension and direction of optimization (maximisation or minimization). The purpose of this article – is to compare different designs of building or its structure and to select the best alternative using criteria of optimality. Case study is demonstrated by selecting the best facade system to cover the building. For this purpose four alternatives of building facades are under consideration. Two criteria (out of three) indicate that for the case study the most preferable facade‘s alternative is gas silicate masonry, covered by Rockwool and “Minerit” facade plates.eng
dc.description.abstractTinkamas sprendimų priėmimo mechanizmas projektuojant pastatą yra labai svarbus priimant strateginius investicijų sprendimus. Klientus yra suinteresuotas ne tik projekto įgyvendinimo kaina, bet ir eksploatavimo išlaidomis. Šio straipsnio tikslas – palyginti skirtingus pastato projektus arba konstrukcijas ir pagal tris optimalumo kriterijus parinkti geriausią alternatyvą. Šie trys kriterijai leidžia įvertinti projektinius sprendinius, kurie gali būti apibūdinami kiekybiniais ir kokybiniais rodikliais, turinčiais skirtingas dimensijas ir optimizavimo kryptį (maksimizavimas arba minimizavimas). Skaitiniame pavyzdyje demonstruojamas geriausios fasado sistemos parinkimas pastatui. Jame svarstomos keturios alternatyvos. Du kriterijai (iš trijų) rodo, kad šiam konkrečiam atvejui tinkamiausias yra fasadas, sumūrytas iš dujų silikato blokelių, aptaisytų ,,Rockwool“ mineraline vata ir ,,Minerit“ fasado plokštėmis.lit
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 189-203
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbyINSPEC
dc.relation.isreferencedbyICONDA
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbySocial Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science)
dc.source.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3846/1648715X.2011.586532
dc.titleSelection of facade's alternatives of commercial and public buildings based on multiple criteria
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.references54
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering
dc.subject.enBuilding life cycle
dc.subject.enAlternatives
dc.subject.enDecision making
dc.subject.enUtility theory
dc.subject.enEntropy weights
dcterms.sourcetitleInternational journal of strategic property management
dc.description.issueno. 2
dc.description.volumeVol. 15
dc.publisher.nameTechnika
dc.publisher.cityVilnius
dc.identifier.doi10.3846/1648715X.2011.586532
dc.identifier.elaba3945965


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record