Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.contributor.authorMorkūnaitė, Žydrūnė
dc.contributor.authorPodvezko, Valentinas
dc.contributor.authorZavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
dc.contributor.authorBaušys, Romualdas
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T18:50:59Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T18:50:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1644-9665
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/132625
dc.description.abstractCultural heritage buildings have architectural, historical and cultural values creating one of the most dominant features, which is related to the local identity. Its preservation requires consideration, liability, know-how, know-why and experienced employee. Cultural heritage buildings’ performance is complicated work, therefore selecting a contractor for heritage buildings’ protection and restoration is a difficult assignment. The improper contractor's choice could activate cost overruns, lag, conflicts, declines, imperfect performance or added expenditure for project administration and accomplishment. This paper submits the quantitative and qualitative criteria setting for selecting heritage's contractor. The Analytic Hierarchy Process technique is applied to decide important criteria and to get the weighting for each criterion. The PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organisation Method for Enrichment Evaluation) technique is applied for the selection of the most efficient cultural heritage contractor's alternative.eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 1056-1071
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbyBazTech
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScience Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2019.05.008
dc.titleContractor selection for renovation of cultural heritage buildings by PROMETHEE method
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.references64
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyFundamentinių mokslų fakultetas / Faculty of Fundamental Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentTvariosios statybos institutas / Institute of Sustainable Construction
dc.subject.researchfieldT 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 007 - Informatikos inžinerija / Informatics engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldN 001 - Matematika / Mathematics
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfieldsSD0404 - Statinių skaitmeninis modeliavimas ir tvarus gyvavimo ciklas / BIM and Sustainable lifecycle of the structures
dc.subject.ltspecializationsL102 - Energetika ir tvari aplinka / Energy and a sustainable environment
dc.subject.enbuilding renovation
dc.subject.encontractor selection
dc.subject.encultural heritage
dc.subject.enMulti-criteria decision making (MCDM)
dcterms.sourcetitleArchives of civil and mechanical engineering
dc.description.issueiss. 4
dc.description.volumevol. 19
dc.publisher.nameElsevier
dc.publisher.cityWrocław
dc.identifier.doi2-s2.0-85067351304
dc.identifier.doiS1644966519300639
dc.identifier.doi85067351304
dc.identifier.doi0
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acme.2019.05.008
dc.identifier.elaba39597940


Šio įrašo failai

FailaiDydisFormatasPeržiūra

Su šiuo įrašu susijusių failų nėra.

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą