Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBivainis, Juozas
dc.contributor.authorZinkevičiūtė, Virgilija
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T19:23:50Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T19:23:50Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn1648-0627
dc.identifier.other(BIS)VGT02-000010483
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/138936
dc.description.abstractStraipsnyje nagrinėjamos strateginių sprendimų vertinimo problemos. Apibrėžta strateginių sprendimų vertinimo vieta verslo strateginiame valdyme, jų objektyvaus įvertinimo svarba ir vertinimo klaidų padariniai. Atsižvelgiant į šiuos aspektus, siūlomas daugiakriteris strateginių sprendimų vertinimo metodas, grindžiamas trijų pakopų kriterijų sistema, jungiančia suderinamumo, ekonominį-finansinį, konkurencingumo ir organizacinės kultūros dalinius integruotus kriterijus. Sprendimų priėmimo objektyvumui padidinti numatyta vertinti jų riziką.lit
dc.description.abstractMajority of business subjects admits that strategic management is of special importance for successful business development. In spite of recent constructive changes for better in this sphere, methodical provision of strategic decisions evaluation is a field that lacks attention. The basic component of the suggested method for strategic decisions evaluation is a system of three levels of criteria uniting the following partial integrated criteria of compatibility, economic-financial, competitive and organizational culture criteria. The formation of these criteria is based on primary criteria paying attention to relative weight of each separate criterion. Paying attention to the diversity of exact combinations of business subjects and a broad wide of business conditions, the following controlled parameters are included into this system of criteria: the list of primary criteria, the weight of primary and partial criteria and the borders of quality assessment intervals. These controlled parameters are the most important preconditions for adaptable possibilities of the suggested method. Taking into account psychological aspects of decision making the evaluation of implementation risks of strategic decisions is given in another block. Strategic decisions are ranked according to the results of a complex integrated criterion and are presented for person making decisions accompanied by risk evaluations while implementing them. The following advantages are peculiar to the suggested method of strategic decisions evaluation: • versatile and complex evaluation; • alternative decisions are compared according to quantitative indicators which increase objectivity; • less non productive evaluation expenditure; • evaluation becomes transparent and clear to business subjects.eng
dc.format.extentp. 3-11
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isolit
dc.relation.isreferencedbyICONDA
dc.relation.isreferencedbyBusiness Source Complete
dc.titleVerslo strateginių sprendimų kompleksinis vertinimas
dc.title.alternativeComplex evaluation of business strategic decisions
dc.typeStraipsnis kitoje DB / Article in other DB
dcterms.references27
dc.type.pubtypeS3 - Straipsnis kitoje DB / Article in other DB
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyVerslo vadybos fakultetas / Faculty of Business Management
dc.subject.researchfieldS 003 - Vadyba / Management
dcterms.sourcetitleVerslas: teorija ir praktika
dc.description.issuenr. 1
dc.description.volumeT. 6
dc.publisher.nameTechnika
dc.publisher.cityVilnius
dc.identifier.elaba3704763


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record