F. Nietzsche ir G. Deleuze: sėslumo simptomatika ir normandiško mąstymo akistatos =

Abstract

Remiantis F. Nietzscbe's ir G. Deleuze'o tekstų analize, siekiama parodyti, kad pagal klasikinio mąstymo kanonus ypač problemisku dalyku tampa naujos minties pasirodymo galimybė. Klasikinis mąstymas traktuojamas kaip sėslios egzistencijos tipas ir jam priesinamas klajokliškas, nomadiškas mąstymas. Pasitelkiant Deleuze's isskirtus atpažinimo ir susitikimo modelius, pirma, siekiama pagrįsti požiūrį, kad ir Nietzsche's filosofiją galime vadinti nomadisku mąstymu ir atitinkancią susitikimo modelį ir antra, siekiama išryškinti naujybės specifiką ir jos steigties transcendentalines sąlygas.

The article deals with F. Nietzsche's and G. Deleuze's attitude to classical thought. Nietzsche's theoretical constructs are based on the principle Wille zw Macht, where he emphatically praised active forces and accused all classical thinking of turning away from life and associating it with reactive, negative forces. Nietzsche's philosophy denies the exceptionally unique true opinion of the world and offers, instead, a variety of interpretations, i. e. a perspectivist approach to the world. In describing architectural metaphors of classical thinking he shows that it is reactive, life-denying, that its assumed grandeur in fact hides the poverty of life. On the other hand, Nietzsche attempts to release tlie metaphoric powerfrom the single axiom of Truth, to release creativity, to legitimize a perspective, interpretative view of the world, based on the mentioned "will-to-power" principle and related to assertive powers of active life. Also, there are analyzed two models of knowledge, recognition and encounter, proposed by G. Deleuze. The main aims of the article is to demonstrate first, that Nietzsche's philosophy can be named as nomadic thinking which corresponds to the model of encounter and, second, reveal the transcendental conditions of innovation.