Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.contributor.authorZavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
dc.contributor.authorAntuchevičienė, Jurgita
dc.contributor.authorŠaparauskas, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorTurskis, Zenonas
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T19:47:31Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T19:47:31Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0424-267X
dc.identifier.other(BIS)VGT02-000026688
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/143184
dc.description.abstractThe paper employs a couple of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods: innovative, newly developed WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment), reputed MOORA (Multiple Objective Optimisation on the basis of Ratio Analysis) method consisting of the Ratio System and the Reference Point approach, also MULTIMOORA (MOORA plus Full Multiplicative Form). Development of WASPAS as an aggregated method of two criteria of optimality, namely WSM (Weighted Sum Model) and WPM (Weighted Product Model) is shortly introduced with references to previous researches of the authors. Application of the method is presented for multiple criteria assessment of alternative building designs. Criteria representing economy of decisions, performance parameters, environmental impact, structural and physical properties of structures are involved for ranking of alternatives and selecting the optimal one. Next, to verify the decision and to validate robustness of the newly developed method, the rather known and reputed MOORA and MULTIMOORA are applied and ranking of alternatives is performed. Conclusions as concerns partial conformity of the methods depending on the weights of both criteria of optimality in the aggregated function are presented.eng
dc.format.extentp. 5-20
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbySocial Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science)
dc.relation.isreferencedbyJournal Citation Reports/Science Edition
dc.relation.isreferencedbySocial SciSearch
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScience Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)
dc.source.urihttp://www.ecocyb.ase.ro/20132/Zavadskas%20%28T%29.pdf
dc.titleMCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.accessRightsIDS Number: 274DY
dcterms.references47
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentStatybos technologijos ir vadybos katedra / Department of Construction Technology and Management
dc.subject.researchfieldS 004 - Ekonomika / Economics
dc.subject.researchfieldT 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 007 - Informatikos inžinerija / Informatics engineering
dc.subject.enMCDM
dc.subject.enWASPAS
dc.subject.enMOORA
dc.subject.enMULTIMOORA
dc.subject.enRobustness
dc.subject.enBuilding design
dcterms.sourcetitleJournal of economic computation and economic cybernetics studies and research (ECECSR)
dc.description.issueno. 2
dc.description.volumeVol. 47
dc.publisher.nameAcademy of Economic Studies
dc.publisher.cityBucharest
dc.identifier.doi000328587300001
dc.identifier.elaba4030419


Šio įrašo failai

Thumbnail

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą