dc.contributor.author | Yazdani, Morteza | |
dc.contributor.author | Zarate, Pascale | |
dc.contributor.author | Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras | |
dc.contributor.author | Turskis, Zenonas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-18T20:14:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-18T20:14:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-1747 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/148125 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the advantage of a combinatory methodology presented in this study. The paper suggests that the comparison with results of previously developed methods is in high agreement. Design/methodology/approach – This paper introduces a combined compromise decision-making algorithm with the aid of some aggregation strategies. The authors have considered a distance measure, which originates from grey relational coefficient and targets to enhance the flexibility of the results. Hence, the weight of the alternatives is placed in the decision-making process with three equations. In the final stage, an aggregated multiplication rule is employed to release the ranking of the alternatives and end the decision process. Findings – The authors described a real case of choosing logistics and transportation companies in France from a supply chain project. Some comparisons such as sensitivity analysis approach and comparing to other studies and methods provided to validate the performance of the proposed algorithm. Originality/value – The algorithm has a unique structure among MCDM methods which is presented for the first time in this paper. | eng |
dc.format | PDF | |
dc.format.extent | p. 2501-2519 | |
dc.format.medium | tekstas / txt | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | INSPEC | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | TOC Premier | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | Scopus | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | Social Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science) | |
dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458 | |
dc.title | A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems | |
dc.type | Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB | |
dcterms.references | 69 | |
dc.type.pubtype | S1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidad Loyola Andalucía | |
dc.contributor.institution | IRIT | |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | |
dc.contributor.faculty | Statybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering | |
dc.contributor.department | Tvariosios statybos institutas / Institute of Sustainable Construction | |
dc.subject.researchfield | T 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering | |
dc.subject.researchfield | S 003 - Vadyba / Management | |
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfields | SD0404 - Statinių skaitmeninis modeliavimas ir tvarus gyvavimo ciklas / BIM and Sustainable lifecycle of the structures | |
dc.subject.ltspecializations | L102 - Energetika ir tvari aplinka / Energy and a sustainable environment | |
dc.subject.en | Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) | |
dc.subject.en | Combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method | |
dc.subject.en | methodology | |
dcterms.sourcetitle | Management decision | |
dc.description.issue | no. 9 | |
dc.description.volume | vol. 57 | |
dc.publisher.name | Emerald Publishing | |
dc.publisher.city | Bingley | |
dc.identifier.doi | 000490251700016 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458 | |
dc.identifier.elaba | 42461142 | |