| dc.contributor.author | Huang, Min | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Xinli | |
| dc.contributor.author | REN, Ruxue | |
| dc.contributor.author | Liao, Huchang | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras | |
| dc.contributor.author | Antuchevičienė, Jurgita | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-18T20:14:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-18T20:14:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1392-3730 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/148155 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In the context of sustainable development, building energy conservation has become the development trend of the construction industry. The selection of energy-saving building program, as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem, has a direct influence on the actual energy-saving effect. In this paper, an integrated MCDM method combining the extended best worst method (BWM) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method is proposed to solve the energy-saving building program selection problem under the linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy environment. The Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets (LPFSs) are used to model the uncertain evaluation information of experts. The extended BWM is developed to determine the weights of criteria, while the extended WASPAS method is proposed to determine the ranking of alternatives. To validate the applicability and reliability of the proposed method, this paper presents a numerical example of the selection problem for energy-saving building programs. Some managerial insights are also given for practitioners to use the proposed method. | eng |
| dc.format | PDF | |
| dc.format.extent | p. 447-458 | |
| dc.format.medium | tekstas / txt | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Gale's Academic OneFile | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | EI Compendex Plus | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | ProQuest Central | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | ICONDA | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | INSPEC | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | DOAJ | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Scopus | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) | |
| dc.rights | Laisvai prieinamas internete | |
| dc.source.uri | https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/12647 | |
| dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12647 | |
| dc.source.uri | https://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:59474742/datastreams/MAIN/content | |
| dc.title | Energy-saving building program evaluation with an integrated method under linguistic environment | |
| dc.type | Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB | |
| dcterms.accessRights | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | |
| dcterms.license | Creative Commons – Attribution – 4.0 International | |
| dcterms.references | 44 | |
| dc.type.pubtype | S1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Sichuan University | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Statybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering | |
| dc.subject.researchfield | T 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering | |
| dc.subject.researchfield | T 007 - Informatikos inžinerija / Informatics engineering | |
| dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfields | SD0202 - Aplinką tausojančios statybinės medžiagos ir technologijos / Low emissions building materials and technologies | |
| dc.subject.ltspecializations | L102 - Energetika ir tvari aplinka / Energy and a sustainable environment | |
| dc.subject.en | energy-saving building | |
| dc.subject.en | construction industry | |
| dc.subject.en | multi-criteria decision making | |
| dc.subject.en | linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy set | |
| dc.subject.en | weighted aggregated sum product assessment | |
| dc.subject.en | best worst method | |
| dcterms.sourcetitle | Journal of civil engineering and management | |
| dc.description.issue | iss. 5 | |
| dc.description.volume | vol. 26 | |
| dc.publisher.name | VGTU Press | |
| dc.publisher.city | Vilnius | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 000537944100004 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3846/jcem.2020.12647 | |
| dc.identifier.elaba | 59474742 | |