Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.contributor.authorMohandes, Saeed Reza
dc.contributor.authorSadeghi, Haleh
dc.contributor.authorMahdiyar, Amir
dc.contributor.authorDurdyev, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorBanaitis, Audrius
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Syuhaida
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T20:19:16Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T20:19:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1392-3730
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/148737
dc.description.abstractRisk decision matrix has widely been favoured by the researchers in the area of construction safety risk assessment. Although it provides the construction safety professionals with the final illustration of the risks magnitude, it suffers from major shortcomings, including inability to considering the importance of probability and severity, impaired analysis resulting from the use of raw numbers for ratings, and the limited range of classifications for assessing the risks. All these shortages give an impaired insight to the concerned parties, deteriorating the involved workers’ safety. As such, this paper aims to develop a novel Risk Assessment Model (RAM) through the integration of the Fuzzy Best Worst Method (FBWM) with the Interval-Valued Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IVFTOPSIS). Based on the application of RAM to a real-life case study, it was observed that the developed RAM contributes to the body of construction safety risk assessment in five unique ways: (1) computing the importance of the two risk parameters (i.e. probability and severity) using fuzzy-reference-based comparisons, (2) obviating the needs for having statistical data, (3) prioritizing the identified risks using the combination of interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers with TOPSIS, (4) providing the safety analysts with wider ranges of classifications for conducting risk assessment, and (5) providing the safety professionals with appropriate evaluation strategies for controlling the analysed risks. The developed model in the study can be applied to any projects, giving a conclusive plan to the concerned safety professionals for adopting the further prudent mitigation measurements.eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 175-188
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScience Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science)
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbyICONDA
dc.relation.isreferencedbyINSPEC
dc.relation.isreferencedbyDOAJ
dc.relation.isreferencedbyGale's Academic OneFile
dc.relation.isreferencedbyTOC Premier
dc.relation.isreferencedbyProQuest Central
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.11926
dc.source.urihttps://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/11926
dc.titleAssessing construction labours’ safety level: a fuzzy MCDM approach
dc.typeStraipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB
dcterms.accessRightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unre-stricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dcterms.licenseCreative Commons – Attribution – 4.0 International
dcterms.references45
dc.type.pubtypeS1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article
dc.contributor.institutionThe Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
dc.contributor.institutionIslamic Azad University, Shiraz
dc.contributor.institutionUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering
dc.subject.researchfieldT 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfieldsSD0404 - Statinių skaitmeninis modeliavimas ir tvarus gyvavimo ciklas / BIM and Sustainable lifecycle of the structures
dc.subject.ltspecializationsL102 - Energetika ir tvari aplinka / Energy and a sustainable environment
dc.subject.ensafety risk assessment
dc.subject.enconstruction safety
dc.subject.eninterval-valued fuzzy number
dc.subject.enmulti-criteria decision-making method
dc.subject.enfuzzy best-worst method
dc.subject.enfuzzy TOPSIS
dc.subject.eninterval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS
dcterms.sourcetitleJournal of civil engineering and management
dc.description.issueiss. 2
dc.description.volumevol. 26
dc.publisher.nameVGTU Press
dc.publisher.cityVilnius
dc.identifier.doi000518026500005
dc.identifier.doi10.3846/jcem.2020.11926
dc.identifier.elaba50979161


Šio įrašo failai

FailaiDydisFormatasPeržiūra

Su šiuo įrašu susijusių failų nėra.

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą