| dc.contributor.author | Iqbal, Shahid | |
| dc.contributor.author | Choudhry, Rafiq M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Holschemacher, Klaus | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ali, Ahsan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tamošaitienė, Jolanta | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-18T20:34:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-18T20:34:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2029-4913 | |
| dc.identifier.other | (BIS)VGT02-000029894 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/150965 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The study revealed that financial issues for projects, accidents on site and defective design are the most significant risks affecting most of construction projects. As further reported, the contractor is responsible for management of most risks occurring at sites during the implementation phase, such as issues related to subcontractors, labour, machinery, availability of materials and quality, while the client is responsible for the risks such as financial issues, issues related to design documents, changes in codes and regulations, and scope of work. Further reported results of the analysis demonstrate that the production of proper schedule by getting updated data of the project and guidance from previous similar projects are the most effective preventive risk management techniques while close supervision and coordination within projects are the most effective remedial risk management techniques. It may be concluded that the most significant risks must be managed with greater effort to reduce/eliminate their effects on the project. As the study concludes, preparation of a proper schedule and good coordination during the implementation stage are very important as they may help project managers to focus on critical areas for better management of projects in Pakistan. | eng |
| dc.format | PDF | |
| dc.format.extent | p. 65-78 | |
| dc.format.medium | tekstas / txt | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Business Source Complete | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | ICONDA | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Scopus | |
| dc.relation.isreferencedby | Social Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science) | |
| dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.994582 | |
| dc.subject | SD04 - Tvarus statinių gyvavimo ciklas / Sustainable lifecycle of the buildings | |
| dc.title | Risk management in construction projects | |
| dc.type | Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB | |
| dcterms.references | 36 | |
| dc.type.pubtype | S1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Technical University | |
| dc.contributor.institution | King Faisal University | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Leipzig University of Applied Science | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Statybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering | |
| dc.subject.researchfield | S 003 - Vadyba / Management | |
| dc.subject.researchfield | T 002 - Statybos inžinerija / Construction and engineering | |
| dc.subject.ltspecializations | L104 - Nauji gamybos procesai, medžiagos ir technologijos / New production processes, materials and technologies | |
| dc.subject.en | Risk | |
| dc.subject.en | Assessment | |
| dc.subject.en | Construction | |
| dcterms.sourcetitle | Technological and economic development of economy | |
| dc.description.issue | no. 1 | |
| dc.description.volume | Vol. 21 | |
| dc.publisher.name | Technika | |
| dc.publisher.city | Vilnius | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3846/20294913.2014.994582 | |
| dc.identifier.elaba | 7466198 | |