dc.contributor.author | Pranckutė, Raminta | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-18T20:42:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-18T20:42:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/151731 | |
dc.description.abstract | Nowadays, the importance of bibliographic databases (DBs) has increased enormously, as they are the main providers of publication metadata and bibliometric indicators universally used both for research assessment practices and for performing daily tasks. Because the reliability of these tasks firstly depends on the data source, all users of the DBs should be able to choose the most suitable one. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus are the two main bibliographic DBs. The comprehensive evaluation of the DBs’ coverage is practically impossible without extensive bibliometric analyses or literature reviews, but most DBs users do not have bibliometric competence and/or are not willing to invest additional time for such evaluations. Apart from that, the convenience of the DB’s interface, performance, provided impact indicators and additional tools may also influence the users’ choice. The main goal of this work is to provide all of the potential users with an all-inclusive description of the two main bibliographic DBs by gathering the findings that are presented in the most recent literature and information provided by the owners of the DBs at one place. This overview should aid all stakeholders employing publication and citation data in selecting the most suitable DB. | eng |
dc.format | PDF | |
dc.format.extent | p. 1-60 | |
dc.format.medium | tekstas / txt | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science) | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | Scopus | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | DOAJ | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | ProQuest Central | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | Gale's Academic OneFile | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | DBLP (Computer Science Bibliography) | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | EconPapers | |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | IDEAS: Economics and Finance Research | |
dc.rights | Laisvai prieinamas internete | |
dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012 | |
dc.source.uri | https://talpykla.elaba.lt/elaba-fedora/objects/elaba:86945447/datastreams/MAIN/content | |
dc.title | Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world | |
dc.type | Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Article in Web of Science DB | |
dcterms.accessRights | This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CCBY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | |
dcterms.license | Creative Commons – Attribution – 4.0 International | |
dcterms.references | 301 | |
dc.type.pubtype | S1 - Straipsnis Web of Science DB / Web of Science DB article | |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | |
dc.contributor.faculty | Biblioteka / Library | |
dc.subject.researchfield | S 008 - Komunikacija ir informacija / Communication and information | |
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfields | EV04 - Komunikacijos valdymas įtraukioje ir kūrybingoje visuomenėje / Communication management in inclusive and creative society | |
dc.subject.ltspecializations | L103 - Įtrauki ir kūrybinga visuomenė / Inclusive and creative society | |
dc.subject.en | WoS | |
dc.subject.en | Scopus | |
dc.subject.en | bibliographic databases | |
dc.subject.en | comparison | |
dc.subject.en | content coverage | |
dc.subject.en | evaluation | |
dc.subject.en | citation impact indicators | |
dcterms.sourcetitle | Publications | |
dc.description.issue | iss. 1 | |
dc.description.volume | vol. 9 | |
dc.publisher.name | MDPI | |
dc.publisher.city | Basel | |
dc.identifier.doi | 000633054800001 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/publications9010012 | |
dc.identifier.elaba | 86945447 | |