Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.contributor.authorAugustinaitė, Dalia
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T07:07:18Z
dc.date.available2023-12-22T07:07:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2029-9990
dc.identifier.other(crossref_id)154450582
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/xmlui/handle/123456789/153840
dc.description.abstractContemporary challenges of sustainability are the results of civilisation action. This reveals necessity of humankind creative patterns (re)evaluation and, based on latest global tendencies, reformation into new – unprecedented – ways for anthropogenic artefacts, such as architecture, development and performance. Abundance of definitions on sustainability makes the task challenging by itself, especially, by changes in context of time and space as well as technological sophistication, interdisciplinarity. Therefore, the article, first of all, puts emphasis on finding the perception of sustainable development essence. It is explained as phased cultural characteristics aligning with range of human needs for outcomes, in terms of the study, named (re)solutions. The complex methodology, by the author formulated as technique 7R, explains the possibilities of sustainable architecture creation as freedom in norms, paradoxically, thus destining precedents and standards, such as traditions, revival rather than negligence. Review of scientific literature, documents, regulations and initiatives, in the first part of the study, serves for induction of sustainability characteristics appearing in alternative fields, such as economy, politics, knowledge, in the second part – of properties of architecture inherent to typological alternatives. Applying deduction principles, study suggests the derived means for sustainable architecture attributes, other types of human-made strategies, such as regulations on architecture. Case study of architecture examples the following findings and, argued also in non-scientific sources, serves for expertise on their authors’ critical creative intentions. The results are discussed, conclusions and suggestions are made.eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 15-29
dc.format.mediumtekstas / txt
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.isreferencedbyScopus
dc.relation.isreferencedbyDimensions
dc.source.urihttps://sace.ktu.lt/index.php/DAS/article/view/34159
dc.titleParadox of creative culture – characteristics on freedom in norms of sustainable architecture
dc.typeStraipsnis Scopus DB / Article in Scopus DB
dcterms.accessRightsThis article is an Open Access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dcterms.licenseCreative Commons – Attribution – 4.0 International
dcterms.references58
dc.type.pubtypeS2 - Straipsnis Scopus DB / Scopus DB article
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas
dc.contributor.facultyArchitektūros fakultetas / Faculty of Architecture
dc.subject.researchfieldH 003 - Menotyra / Art studies
dc.subject.vgtuprioritizedfieldsSD0303 - Architektūra ir urbanistinė aplinka / Architecture and Built Environment
dc.subject.ltspecializationsL102 - Energetika ir tvari aplinka / Energy and a sustainable environment
dc.subject.enparadox of creative culture
dc.subject.enphases of sustainable culture
dc.subject.ensustainable architecture
dc.subject.entechnique 7R
dc.subject.enunprecedented architecture
dcterms.sourcetitleJournal of sustainable architecture and civil engineering = Darnioji architektūra ir statyba
dc.description.issueiss. 2
dc.description.volumevol. 33
dc.publisher.nameKauno Technologijos Universitetas
dc.publisher.cityKaunas
dc.identifier.doi154450582
dc.identifier.doi2-s2.0-85176012412
dc.identifier.doi85176012412
dc.identifier.doi1
dc.identifier.doi10.5755/j01.sace.33.2.34159
dc.identifier.elaba182484534


Šio įrašo failai

FailaiDydisFormatasPeržiūra

Su šiuo įrašu susijusių failų nėra.

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą