• Lietuvių
    • English
  • English 
    • Lietuvių
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Mokslinės publikacijos (PDB) / Scientific publications (PDB)
  • Moksliniai ir apžvalginiai straipsniai / Research and Review Articles
  • Straipsniai Web of Science ir/ar Scopus referuojamuose leidiniuose / Articles in Web of Science and/or Scopus indexed sources
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Mokslinės publikacijos (PDB) / Scientific publications (PDB)
  • Moksliniai ir apžvalginiai straipsniai / Research and Review Articles
  • Straipsniai Web of Science ir/ar Scopus referuojamuose leidiniuose / Articles in Web of Science and/or Scopus indexed sources
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The selection of wagons for the internal transport of a logistics company: a novel approach based on rough BWM and rough SAW methods

Thumbnail
Date
2017
Author
Stević, Željko
Pamučar, Dragan
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
Ćirović, Goran
Prentkovskis, Olegas
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The rationalization of logistics activities and processes is very important in the business and efficiency of every company. In this respect, transportation as a subsystem of logistics, whether internal or external, is potentially a huge area for achieving significant savings. In this paper, the emphasis is placed upon the internal transport logistics of a paper manufacturing company. It is necessary to rationalize the movement of vehicles in the company’s internal transport, that is, for the majority of the transport to be transferred to rail transport, because the company already has an industrial track installed in its premises. To do this, it is necessary to purchase at least two used wagons. The problem is formulated as a multi-criteria decision model with eight criteria and eight alternatives. The paper presents a new approach based on a combination of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and rough numbers, which is used for ranking the potential solutions and selecting the most suitable one. The rough Best–Worst Method (BWM) was used to determine the weight values of the criteria. The results obtained using a combination of these two methods in their rough form were verified by means of a sensitivity analysis consisting of a change in the weight criteria and comparison with the following methods in their conventional and rough forms: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Ordering Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and MultiAttributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). The results show very high stability of the model and ranks that are the same or similar in different scenarios.
Issue date (year)
2017
URI
https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/119058
Collections
  • Straipsniai Web of Science ir/ar Scopus referuojamuose leidiniuose / Articles in Web of Science and/or Scopus indexed sources [7946]

 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects / KeywordsInstitutionFacultyDepartment / InstituteTypeSourcePublisherType (PDB/ETD)Research fieldStudy directionVILNIUS TECH research priorities and topicsLithuanian intelligent specializationThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects / KeywordsInstitutionFacultyDepartment / InstituteTypeSourcePublisherType (PDB/ETD)Research fieldStudy directionVILNIUS TECH research priorities and topicsLithuanian intelligent specialization

My Account

LoginRegister