• Lietuvių
    • English
  • English 
    • Lietuvių
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Mokslinės publikacijos (PDB) / Scientific publications (PDB)
  • Moksliniai ir apžvalginiai straipsniai / Research and Review Articles
  • Straipsniai Web of Science ir/ar Scopus referuojamuose leidiniuose / Articles in Web of Science and/or Scopus indexed sources
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Mokslinės publikacijos (PDB) / Scientific publications (PDB)
  • Moksliniai ir apžvalginiai straipsniai / Research and Review Articles
  • Straipsniai Web of Science ir/ar Scopus referuojamuose leidiniuose / Articles in Web of Science and/or Scopus indexed sources
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Location preferences of new pedestrian bridges based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and GIS-based estimation

Thumbnail
View/Open
3989-13659-1-PB.pdf (2.824Mb)
Date
2020
Author
Zagorskas, Jurgis
Turskis, Zenonas
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Non-motorized pedestrian and bicycle traffic is an effective and efficient tool for reducing the negative environmental impacts of transport and improving the quality of life in urban conditions. The strategies of creating new attractive spaces on the waterfront are prevalent amongst the municipalities in different countries. This kind of development intends the construction of new connection bridges, usually meant solely for walking and cycling. There are a significant number of studies covering the theme of pedestrian bridges, but the studies typically focus on technical parameters – serviceability, stress and vibrations, specifications for the design. Researchers and stakeholders rarely discuss displacement strategy, expenditure and future usability. This study aims to find out the best and the most useful bridge locations that would contribute to pedestrian network improvement, would add value to city image and give other benefits. A novel hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model, based on five different multi-criteria decision-making methods: Multiplicative Exponential Weighting (MEW), method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), an Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method, expert judgement, and Step‐Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA), is presented. A developed model allows solving complicated problems and finding a rationally, balanced solution. Arguments derived from this study help politicians and town planners as well as society.
Issue date (year)
2020
URI
https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/150385
Collections
  • Straipsniai Web of Science ir/ar Scopus referuojamuose leidiniuose / Articles in Web of Science and/or Scopus indexed sources [7946]

 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects / KeywordsInstitutionFacultyDepartment / InstituteTypeSourcePublisherType (PDB/ETD)Research fieldStudy directionVILNIUS TECH research priorities and topicsLithuanian intelligent specializationThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects / KeywordsInstitutionFacultyDepartment / InstituteTypeSourcePublisherType (PDB/ETD)Research fieldStudy directionVILNIUS TECH research priorities and topicsLithuanian intelligent specialization

My Account

LoginRegister