dc.rights.license | Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Šešok, Andžela | |
dc.contributor.author | Mizeras, Deividas | |
dc.contributor.author | Valiulis, Algirdas Vaclovas | |
dc.contributor.author | Griškevičius, Julius | |
dc.contributor.author | Malinauskas, Mangirdas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-28T07:39:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-28T07:39:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-03-09 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9786094579592 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/153959 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this work we aim to determine the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA objects having various orientation woodpile microarchitectures. In this work we chose three different 3D microarchitectures: woodpile BCC (each layer consists of parallel logs which are rotated 90 deg every next layer), woodpile FCC (every layer is additionally shifted half of the period in respect to the previous parallel log layer) and a rotating woodpile 60 deg (each layer is rotated 60 deg in respect to the previous one). Compressive and bending tests were carried out TIRAtest2300 universal testing machine. We found that 60 deg rotating woodpile geometry had the highest values which was approximately 3 times than the BCC or FCC log arrangements. Thus we prove that employing low-cost equipment and applying the same raw material one can create objects of desired rigidity. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3 p. | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Tekstas / Text | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/153951 | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/153950 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source.uri | http://biomdlore.vgtu.lt/index.php/biomdlore/2016/paper/view/84 | en_US |
dc.subject | scaffolds | en_US |
dc.subject | polylactic acid (PLA) | en_US |
dc.subject | microstructure | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of different microstructure scaffolds for tissue regeneration | en_US |
dc.type | Konferencijos publikacija / Conference paper | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | Laisvai prieinamas / Openly available | en_US |
dcterms.accrualMethod | Rankinis pateikimas / Manual submission | en_US |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2016-04-22 | |
dcterms.issued | 2016-10-22 | |
dcterms.license | CC BY | en_US |
dcterms.references | 6 | en_US |
dc.description.version | Taip / Yes | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilnius University | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilnius Gediminas Technical University | en_US |
dcterms.sourcetitle | Proceedings of 11th International Conference BIOMDLORE 2016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 9786094579585 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2345-0630 | en_US |
dc.publisher.name | Technika | en_US |
dc.publisher.country | Lithuania | en_US |
dc.publisher.country | Lietuva | en_US |
dc.publisher.city | Vilnius | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3846/biomdlore.2016.08 | en_US |