dc.rights.license | Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Keršulienė, Violeta | |
dc.contributor.author | Butkienė, Jūratė | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-09T09:43:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-09T09:43:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9786094761195 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2029-4441 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/154181 | |
dc.description.abstract | Countries in conflict, trying to make a resolution, encounter a decision process. Often, in practice decisions are made based on groundless rationalization, therefore it is commonly believed that it is experience and intuition that are key to the decision making process. Since decisions in law are usually based on logical reasoning, taking into account conflict circumstances and facts, the success of this decision can be determined with mathematical calculation. In recent decades, as the boundries between scholarly disciplines blur, new ones are formed, which are not entirely indepedent, but bring in new research methods. Law and economics is a clear example of this interdisciplinery relation. The law system impacts the economical atmosphere, therefore before taking decision in law, economical aspects must be evaluated. Striving to resolve the disputes between parties at work mathematical calculations are used in order to analyze the expected behaviour of each party. Guidance for parties having dispute is the most economically viable option for completing the dispute. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 8 | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Tekstas / Text | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/154008 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source.uri | https://bm.vgtu.lt/index.php/verslas/2018/paper/view/454 | en_US |
dc.subject | dispute | en_US |
dc.subject | decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | negotiation | en_US |
dc.subject | game theory | en_US |
dc.title | Choosing the most economically advantageous solution to the decision of the issue | en_US |
dc.type | Konferencijos publikacija / Conference paper | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | Laisvai prieinamas / Openly available | en_US |
dcterms.accrualMethod | Rankinis pateikimas / Manual submission | en_US |
dcterms.alternative | Social and economic business environment | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2018-05-04 | |
dcterms.license | CC BY | en_US |
dcterms.references | 29 | en_US |
dc.description.version | Taip / Yes | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilnius Gediminas Technical University | en_US |
dc.contributor.faculty | Kūrybinių industrijų fakultetas / Faculty of Creative Industries | en_US |
dc.contributor.faculty | Verslo vadybos fakultetas / Faculty of Business Management | en_US |
dcterms.sourcetitle | 10th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2018” | en_US |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 9786094761188 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2029-929X | en_US |
dc.publisher.name | Vilnius Gediminas Technical University | en_US |
dc.publisher.name | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | en_US |
dc.publisher.country | Lithuania | en_US |
dc.publisher.country | Lietuva | en_US |
dc.publisher.city | Vilnius | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2018.33 | en_US |