Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorBielskus, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorMotuzienė, Violeta
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-05T08:12:18Z
dc.date.available2024-09-05T08:12:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-02-04
dc.identifier.issn2029-7092en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/154833
dc.description.abstractMany studies show, that there is a difference between actual and design energy consumption in energy efficient and sustainable buildings. As a rule, buildings consume more energy than it has been foreseen at the design stage. Occupants’ behaviour in buildings is also identified as one of the main reasons causing the so called Performance Gap. Having mobile workstations, opened plan offices are becoming more popular in design solutions in sustainable buildings. Here we have studied one of such office spaces. Monitoring of real occupancy was performed and real occupation schedules were statistically generated. The schedules were compared to the ones given by European Standard for energy performance calculation as well as with default schedules proposed by simulation software DesignBuilder. The comparison shows a significantly lower measured occupancy compared to the above-mentioned schedules. To compare the influence of occupancy related assumptions on predicted energy demand, DesignBuilder model was created and simulated for 3 different occupancy schedules. The results have shown that primary energy demand of a building due to assumptions related with an occupancy, compared to default DesignBuilder schedules are: 111 kWh/m² (32%) higher than the standard case and 152 kWh/m² (44%) than the actual one.en_US
dc.format.extent7 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/154498en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.source.urihttp://enviro.vgtu.lt/index.php/enviro/2020/paper/view/827en_US
dc.subjectpassive occupants’ behaviouren_US
dc.subjectopen plan officeen_US
dc.subjectschedulesen_US
dc.subjectPerformance Gapen_US
dc.subjectenergy simulationen_US
dc.titleThe influence of schedules of open office occupants’ presence on building’s energy demanden_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.accrualMethodRankinis pateikimas / Manual submissionen_US
dcterms.alternativeEnergy for buildingsen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-31
dcterms.issued2020-05-22
dcterms.licenseCC BYen_US
dcterms.references8en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetasen_US
dc.contributor.institutionVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.contributor.facultyAplinkos inžinerijos fakultetas / Faculty of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPastatų energetikos katedra / Department of Building Energeticsen_US
dcterms.sourcetitle11th International Conference “Environmental Engineering” (ICEE-2020)en_US
dc.identifier.eisbn9786094762321en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2029-7092en_US
dc.publisher.nameVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.publisher.nameVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetasen_US
dc.publisher.countryLithuaniaen_US
dc.publisher.countryLietuvaen_US
dc.publisher.cityVilniusen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2020.827en_US


Šio įrašo failai

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Išskyrus atvejus, kai nurodyta kitaip, šio įrašo licencija apibrėžiama taipKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence