Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorLember, Erki
dc.contributor.authorPachel, Karin
dc.contributor.authorLoigu, Enn
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T08:26:09Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T08:26:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2029-7092en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/154901
dc.description.abstractThe presence of pharmaceutical residues in the receiving waterbodies of wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) and in the environment has become a global concern. We can now say for certain that, having metabolised in our bodies, partially modified or unmodified pharmaceuticals will reach WWTP. However, WWTP are not designed for the removal of such com pounds. Only a small fraction of pharmaceuticals decompose during biological treatment or are adsorbed in sediment. There fore, it is essential to find a treatment process that is capable of removing pharmaceutical residues. The aim of the present study was to research the removal of three pharmaceuticals found in the environment, namely diclofenac (DCF), sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and levofloxacin (LFX), through the use of powdered activated carbon (PAC). To this end, adsorption tests were con ducted where the adsorption capacity was estimated according to the adsorbent dose and the residence time of the process. LFX had the highest adsorption rate: the removal effectiveness was 77% in a residence time of 5 minutes and in 60 minutes a stable indicator was achieved whereby 94% of LFX had become adsorbed. The worst adsorption property was observed for SMX, as 68% of SMX was adsorbed in a residence time of 60 minutes. According to the conducted tests, the Freundlich adsorption isotherms and constants characterising the adsorption were found where the DCF K was 23.8, the SMX K was 34.3 and the LFX K was 106.1. This test demonstrated that the pharmaceuticals selected for the experiment could easily be subjected to adsorption processes and could be removed by means of PAC.en_US
dc.format.extent7 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/154497en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.source.urihttp://enviro.vgtu.lt/index.php/enviro/2017/paper/view/12en_US
dc.subjectadsorption of pharmaceuticalsen_US
dc.subjectremoval of pharmaceutical residuesen_US
dc.subjectdiclofenac removalen_US
dc.subjectsulfamethoxazole removalen_US
dc.titleAdsorption of diclofenac, sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin with powdered activated carbonen_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.alternativeWater engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2017-04-28
dcterms.licenseCC BY NCen_US
dcterms.references45en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionTallinn University of Technologyen_US
dcterms.sourcetitle10th International Conference “Environmental Engineering” (ICEE-2017)en_US
dc.identifier.eisbn9786094760440en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2029-7092en_US
dc.publisher.nameVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.publisher.nameVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetasen_US
dc.publisher.countryLithuaniaen_US
dc.publisher.countryLietuvaen_US
dc.publisher.cityVilniusen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2017.082en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence