Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorRusowicz, Artur
dc.contributor.authorRuciński, Adam
dc.contributor.authorLaskowski, Rafał
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T11:47:19Z
dc.date.available2024-10-17T11:47:19Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2029-7092en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/155310
dc.description.abstractOne of main issues concerning server room operation is appropriate cooling of electronic modules to prevent excessive heat generation resulting in their damage. Since high cooling powers are required, precision air conditioning systems are used that are specially designed for cooling server and equipment rooms, server cabinets, etc. These devices require very large energy supplies. The paper proposes an upgrade of a cooling system for three server rooms in which refrigeration equipment with a cooling power of 1.873 MW is installed. The average actual cooling power demand is 890 kW, and some units work as a standby. Thir-eight direct-evaporation air-conditioning cabinets are installed. The refrigerant is R407C. The devices have been operated for 14 years; therefore, the refrigeration equipment should be replaced with modern units. The paper compares three approaches: replacing the units with similar ones based on newer technology, introducing contained aisle configurations of rack cabinets and units based on newer technology with additional EconoPhase modules. The application of free cooling was not analyzed since mounting additional heat exchangers was impossible (due to the lack of space and limited roof loading capacity). The paper provides capital and operating costs of the solutions. The introduction of up-to-date units and replacing condensers resulted in lowering the electric power demand by 16%. The simple payback time (SPBT) of this solution is 18.8 years. The energy savings achieved through the second solution (contained aisle configurations of rack cabinets) amount to 37.8%, with SPBT equal to 8.38 years. Variant III, consisting in using modern units with additional EconoPhase modules, significantly improves energy savings (48.3%) but it requires large capital expenditure, with simple payback time of 12.1 years.en_US
dc.format.extent6 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/154497en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.source.urihttp://enviro.vgtu.lt/index.php/enviro/2017/paper/view/153en_US
dc.subjectdata centeren_US
dc.subjectair conditioningen_US
dc.subjectinfrastructure energy efficiencyen_US
dc.titleThe analysis of modifications in cooling systems for high-performance data centers. A case studyen_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.alternativeEnergy for buildingsen_US
dcterms.issued2017-04-28
dcterms.references10en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionWarsaw University of Technologyen_US
dcterms.sourcetitle10th International Conference “Environmental Engineering” (ICEE-2017)en_US
dc.identifier.eisbn9786094760440en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2029-7092en_US
dc.publisher.nameVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.publisher.nameVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetasen_US
dc.publisher.countryLithuaniaen_US
dc.publisher.countryLietuvaen_US
dc.publisher.cityVilniusen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2017.273en_US


Šio įrašo failai

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Išskyrus atvejus, kai nurodyta kitaip, šio įrašo licencija apibrėžiama taipKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence