dc.rights.license | Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ginevičius, Romualdas | |
dc.contributor.author | Suhajda, Karel | |
dc.contributor.author | Petraškevičius, Vladislavas | |
dc.contributor.author | Šimkūnaitė, Jolita | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-18T06:18:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-18T06:18:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1877-0428 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/155323 | |
dc.description.abstract | Multicriteria evaluation methods were applied in Lithuania for the evaluation of construction projects by various aspects more than thirty years ago. It appeared to be a universal technique to reflect the condition of any socioeconomic system quantitatively. Such methods have been used successfully for such kind of problems solving for some tens of years, therefore it is significant to generalize the experience of many years and on its basis to bring to light problematic questions and those ones which should be solved. The critical analysis of the multicriteria evaluation stages revealed the following shortcomings. First, while forming the indexes list, it is a rare case when all possible sources are used. Second, the system of the examined expression indexes is formed on the ground of this list subjectively and without applying scientific methods. Third, the determination of indexes weights is incorrect, especially when a big number of indexes is evaluated. Fourth, there is no solution of the question what multicriteria evaluation method should be applied for a concrete problem solving. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 9 p. | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Tekstas / Text | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/155081 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.source.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281305581X | en_US |
dc.subject | MCDA | en_US |
dc.subject | multicriteria evaluation stages and methods | en_US |
dc.title | Lithuanian experience of quantitative evaluation of socioeconomic systems position by multicriteria methods | en_US |
dc.type | Konferencijos publikacija / Conference paper | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | Laisvai prieinamas / Openly available | en_US |
dcterms.accrualMethod | Rankinis pateikimas / Manual submission | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2014-01-24 | |
dcterms.license | CC BY NC ND | en_US |
dcterms.references | 42 | en_US |
dc.description.version | Taip / Yes | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilnius Gediminas Technical University | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | BRNO Technical University | en_US |
dc.contributor.faculty | Verslo vadybos fakultetas / Faculty of Business Management | en_US |
dcterms.sourcetitle | Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.volume | vol. 110 | en_US |
dc.publisher.name | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.941 | en_US |