Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorGaspars-Wieloch, Helena
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-18T11:29:06Z
dc.date.available2024-11-18T11:29:06Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.isbn9786094761614en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/155696
dc.description.abstractPurpose – scenario planning is very helpful when the decision maker deals with uncertain issues. Probabilities are also frequently applied to such problems. In the paper, we examine the correctness of combining probabilities with scenario planning in economic decisions which are usually made under uncertainty. The goal of the article is to find and discuss cases where the use of probabilities in scenario planning is appropriate and cases where such an approach is not desirable. Research methodology – in order to achieve this target, we first make a concise literature review of existing approaches concerning the application of probabilities to scenario planning. Then, we investigate and compare diverse decision making circumstances presented by means of numerical examples and differing from each other with regard to the nature of the decision problem (way of payoff estimation, novelty degree of the problem, access to historical data etc.) and the decision maker’s objectives and preferences (one-shot or multi-shots decisions, attitude towards risk). We explore the newsvendor problem, the spare parts quantity problem, the project selection problem and the project time management with scenario-based decision project graphs. Findings – the work contains both recommendations already described in the literature and suggestions formulated by the author. We get to the point that scenario planning is unquestionable support for decision making under uncertainty, however, the use of probabilities as an accompanying tool may be necessary and justified in some specific cases only. Their significance depends for instance on (1) the number of times a given variant is supposed to be executed; (2) the decision maker’s knowledge about the considered problem; (3) the novelty degree of the problem; (4) the decision maker’s conviction that the probability values really reflect his/her attitude towards risk. The analysis of numerical examples leads us to the conclusion that scenario planning should not be linked with the likelihood (1) for one-shot decisions problems; (2) for decision problems related to different kinds of innovation; (3) in the case of lack of certainty which type of probability definition ought to be applied to a given situation; (4) if the decision maker anticipates new future factors not included in historical data. Research limitations – in the paper we mainly analyse one-criterion problems and payoff matrices with data precisely defined. Further conclusions can be obtained after investigating multi-criteria cases and examples with interval payoffs. We limit our research to selected probability definitions. Nevertheless, a wider review can lead to new interesting observations. Practical implications – the aforementioned findings are crucial in such domains as economic modeling and decision theory. The results of the research can be used in planning, management, and decision optimization. They provide valuable guidelines for each decision maker dealing with an uncertain future. Originality/Value – authors of previous papers related to this topic have already formulated many significant conclusions. However, this contribution examines the problem from a new point of view since it concentrates on novel decisions, concerning unique, innovative or innovation projects (products). It encourages the decision makers to treat problems usually called in the literature “stochastic problems” (i.e. with known probability distribution) as “strategic problems” (i.e. with unknown probability distribution). This is especially the case of the newsvendor problem and the spare parts quantity problem.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Center, Polanden_US
dc.format.extent11 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/155623en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.source.urihttp://cibmee.vgtu.lt/index.php/verslas/2019/paper/view/422en_US
dc.subjectscenario planningen_US
dc.subjectprobabilitiesen_US
dc.subjectpayoff matrixen_US
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectinnovationen_US
dc.subjectdecision maker’s preferencesen_US
dc.subjecteconomic decisionsen_US
dc.titleRole of scenario planning and probabilities in economic decision problems – literature review and new conclusionsen_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.accrualMethodRankinis pateikimas / Manual submissionen_US
dcterms.alternativeContemporary issues in economics engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2019-05-10
dcterms.licenseCC BYen_US
dcterms.references84en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionPoznan University of Economics and Businessen_US
dcterms.sourcetitleInternational Scientific Conference „Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering ‘2019“en_US
dc.identifier.eisbn9786094761621en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2538-8711en_US
dc.publisher.nameVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.publisher.nameVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetasen_US
dc.publisher.countryLithuaniaen_US
dc.publisher.countryLietuvaen_US
dc.publisher.cityVilniusen_US
dc.description.grantnumber2014/15/D/HS4/00771en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3846/cibmee.2019.011en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence