Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorVersal, Nataliia
dc.contributor.authorErastov, Vasyl
dc.contributor.authorBalytska, Mariia
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T13:50:53Z
dc.date.available2024-11-26T13:50:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-02-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/155886
dc.description.abstractPurpose – to reveal prerequisites of technology-enabled banking development in Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine; to identify if digitalization was a beneficial factor in households deposits-raising during the COVID-19. Research methodology is twofold: analysis of digitalization index based on World Bank data as a premise of technology-enabled banks development; beta-coefficient analysis and descriptive statistics – for digitalization influence assessment. Findings – digitalization index analysis showed that Lithuania has a more generous benefit in terms of digitalization. Poland and Ukraine follow with a slight gap. Traditional banks of analyzed countries are acting towards digitalization but at different paces. There are both digital and neobanks in Lithuania and Poland, while in Ukraine only digital banks. Analysis of Ukrainian banks deposits highlighted the fact that digital banks were in some cases more preferable for households, especially during a pandemic. Research limitations – lack of data: common digitalization indexes could not be calculated for Ukraine; differences in countries’ banking data: content and structuring criteria. Practical implications – the results could be important for policy recommendations to tackle the blind spots of banking digitalization. Originality/Value – suggested digitalization index could be utilized as a universal. Due to DESI limitations, common for EU countries, we were to create our own index and compare results with calculated by European Commission DESI values. While DESI is calculated using some specific survey data, the proposed index is using standardized data of World Bank; the results of digital and traditional banks deposits comparison could be useful for further study.en_US
dc.format.extent12 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/155629en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.source.urihttp://cibmee.vgtu.lt/index.php/verslas/2021/paper/view/608en_US
dc.subjectdigital banksen_US
dc.subjectneobanksen_US
dc.subjectdigitalization indexen_US
dc.subjecthousehold depositsen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.titleIs digital 'New normal' or 'Challenge' for banks under COVID-19?en_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.accrualMethodRankinis pateikimas / Manual submissionen_US
dcterms.alternativeContemporary financial managementen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-01
dcterms.issued2021-05-14
dcterms.licenseCC BYen_US
dcterms.references23en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiven_US
dcterms.sourcetitleInternational Scientific Conference „Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering ‘2021“en_US
dc.identifier.eisbn9786094762604en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2538-8711en_US
dc.publisher.nameVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.publisher.nameVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetasen_US
dc.publisher.countryLithuaniaen_US
dc.publisher.countryLietuvaen_US
dc.publisher.cityVilniusen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3846/cibmee.2021.608en_US


Šio įrašo failai

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Išskyrus atvejus, kai nurodyta kitaip, šio įrašo licencija apibrėžiama taipKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence