dc.contributor.author | Šileikaitė, Inga | |
dc.contributor.author | Lesnikauskas, Laimutis | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-17T09:26:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-17T09:26:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/156847 | |
dc.description.abstract | Straipsnyje nagrinėjama dešimt įvairių standartinių ir inovatyvių, skirtingomis techninėmis savybėmis pasižyminčių termoizoliacinių medžiagų. Sprendžiamas sudėtingas daugiatikslis uždavinys, kuriuo siekiama nustatyti ir parinkti efektyviausią alternatyvą. Taikomi TOPSIS ir COPRAS daugiakriteriai metodai, tačiau dėl rezultatų nesutapimo, daroma išvada, kad tokiam uždaviniui išspręsti turi būti taikomas hibridinis daugiatikslis metodas. Rodiklių reikšmingumas nustatomas analitiniu hierarchijų proceso (AHP) metodu. TOPSIS metodu nustatoma, kad efektyviausia šiltinimo medžiaga yra putplastis, COPRAS metodu – kanapių vata. Nagrinėjant šiuos straipsnio rezultatus, galima teigti, kad inovatyvios medžiagos nebūtinai yra efektyvesnės negu standartinės. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The article analyses conventional and innovative facade thermal insulation materials. Nowadays, economic, environmental and social factors are extremely relevant, therefore the construction sector participants can hardly decide which insulation materials are the most effective to use. To assess the effectiveness, the task is being solved. Thermal insulation materials effectiveness criteria has different optimization directions and units of measurement. In this case the task can be called a group hybrid multi-criterion task. The choice between conventional and innovative materials for thermal insulation of exterior walls is rather complex, so it is impossible to identify and select the best alternative by the one method. For the task performance indicators, their values and determination of the significance, expert method is adapted. The hierarchy analysis method (AHP) was used to assess the indicators of health impact, environmental and materials reuse. Determining which a priority is the most efficient thermal insulation material, COPRAS and TOPSIS methods were used. Using these methods, obtained completely different answers: the TOPSIS method determined that the most effective heat insulation material is a foam, the COPRAS method - hemp wool. As a result, it can be said that the innovative materials are not necessarily more effective than the standard ones. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 10 p. | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Tekstas / Text | en_US |
dc.language.iso | lt | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/156767 | en_US |
dc.source.uri | http://jmk.statyba.vgtu.lt/index.php/statyba/2017/paper/view/8 | en_US |
dc.subject | daugiatikslis | en_US |
dc.subject | inovatyvios termoizoliacinės medžiagos | en_US |
dc.subject | COPRAS | en_US |
dc.subject | TOPSIS | en_US |
dc.subject | AHP | en_US |
dc.subject | multiple-criteria decision analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | innovative thermal insulation materials | en_US |
dc.subject | COPRAS | en_US |
dc.subject | TOPSIS | en_US |
dc.subject | AHP | en_US |
dc.title | Grupinis hibridinis išorinių atitvarų daugiatikslis selektonovacijos modelis | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Group hybrid external partitions multi-purpose selectonovation model | en_US |
dc.type | Konferencijos publikacija / Conference paper | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | Laisvai prieinamas / Openly available | en_US |
dcterms.accrualMethod | Rankinis pateikimas / Manual submission | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2017-03-03 | |
dcterms.references | 32 | en_US |
dc.description.version | Taip / Yes | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilnius Gediminas Technical University | en_US |
dc.contributor.faculty | Statybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering | en_US |
dcterms.sourcetitle | Statyba: 20-osios jaunųjų mokslininkų konferencijos „Mokslas – Lietuvos ateitis“ teminė konferencija / Civil Engineering: Proceedings of the 20th Conference for Junior Researchers "Science - Future of Lithuania" | en_US |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 9786094760280 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2029-7149 | en_US |
dc.publisher.name | Vilnius Gediminas Technical University | en_US |
dc.publisher.name | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | en_US |
dc.publisher.country | Lithuania | en_US |
dc.publisher.country | Lietuva | en_US |
dc.publisher.city | Vilnius | en_US |