Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorKušar, Matej
dc.contributor.authorŠubic-Kovač, Maruška
dc.contributor.authorŠelih, Jana
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-16T10:50:58Z
dc.date.available2025-05-16T10:50:58Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1877-7058en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/157626
dc.description.abstractOver the past two decades, the importance of the management of existing buildings is continuously increasing with time. Refurbishment of buildings requires execution of various measures that have to be carefully chosen, as selection of a set of refurbishment actions demands that the goals of contemporary sustainable development are achieved. Therefore, a rational decision model is required to select a set of refurbishment measures for a building that results in largest total benefit to cost ratio. This ratio has to be calculated on the basis of several relevant criteria. The basic criteria are identified in this paper as life cycle costs of the building and its structural safety. In Slovenia, an important component of the latter criterion is earthquake resistance, while life cycle costs are predominantly linked to energy consumption of the building. Development and justification of the multi-criteria decision model is presented in the next step. The use of the model is limited to buildings in public ownership. The model takes into the account the fact that refurbishment measures carried out in the present result in reduced operation and maintenance costs over the remaining service life. Life cycle costs reduced due to building energy retrofit have a major impact upon the environmental and economic performance of the building during its operation, while the earthquake resistance improvement (since it decreases the probability of lost human lives) has primarily social impact.en_US
dc.format.extent6 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/156173en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.source.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705813008151en_US
dc.subjectbuilding refurbishmenten_US
dc.subjectpublic buildingsen_US
dc.subjectmulti-criteria decision modelen_US
dc.subjectearthquake resistanceen_US
dc.subjectenergy rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectlife cycle costsen_US
dc.titleSelection of efficient retrofit scenarios for public buildingsen_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.accrualMethodRankinis pateikimas / Manual submissionen_US
dcterms.issued2013-05-17
dcterms.licenseCC BY NC NDen_US
dcterms.references21en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Ljubljanaen_US
dcterms.sourcetitleProcedia Engineeringen_US
dc.description.volumevol. 57en_US
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren_US
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.cityOxforden_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.082en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence