Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorKutut, Vladislavas
dc.contributor.authorZavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
dc.contributor.authorLazauskas, Marius
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-16T10:55:15Z
dc.date.available2025-05-16T10:55:15Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1877-7058en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/157627
dc.description.abstractNumerous countries are trying to find the best method for suitable management of real estate objects that encompass both material value and cultural property. Cultural property can be defined as historical heritage in the form of volumetric and planned spaces of buildings. Yet another problem lurks in utilization and maintenance of such buildings, which are usually regulated by national legislation thus aggravating certain decision-making processes related to their adjustment to the needs of the public or investors. This article addresses the status of some buildings located in the historic city centre of Vilnius and analyses indicators, on the basis of which such buildings could be assessed in order to identify their need for reconstruction, considering archaeological, historical, architectural, economic, social and other arguments. As experience in reconstruction suggests, such decisions demand for well-reasoned and precise concepts as each hasty conclusion usually results in mistakes that demand for additional work and funds. ARAS method, which is well-known in decision-making, have been chosen to design the algorithm for priority setting.en_US
dc.format.extent5 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/156173en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.source.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705813008163en_US
dc.subjectcultural heritage buildingen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical Hierarchy Processen_US
dc.subjectARASen_US
dc.subjectdecision methoden_US
dc.subjectconstruction projecten_US
dc.titleAssessment of priority options for preservation of historic city centre buildings using MCDM (ARAS)en_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.accrualMethodRankinis pateikimas / Manual submissionen_US
dcterms.issued2013-05-17
dcterms.licenseCC BY NC NDen_US
dcterms.references21en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetasen_US
dc.contributor.institutionVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.contributor.facultyStatybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineeringen_US
dcterms.sourcetitleProcedia Engineeringen_US
dc.description.volumevol. 57en_US
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren_US
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.cityOxforden_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.083en_US


Šio įrašo failai

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Išskyrus atvejus, kai nurodyta kitaip, šio įrašo licencija apibrėžiama taipKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence