dc.rights.license | Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Volvačiovas, Robertas | |
dc.contributor.author | Turskis, Zenonas | |
dc.contributor.author | Aviža, Donatas | |
dc.contributor.author | Mikštienė, Rūta | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-26T13:36:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-26T13:36:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1877-7058 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/157703 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper discuss problem of retrofitting strategy selection. The aim is to determine in which way is rationally to update public buildings.
Nine feasible alternatives of buildings retrofitting scenarios were developed. The essence of these scenarios is number of stages and time
of retrofitting works. A set of five key attributes, which adequately describes the alternatives, was determined and SWARA method was
used to determine weights of attributes. Multi-attribute optimization problem is determined and solved. Three different multi-attribute
decision making methods (SAW, TOPSIS and COPRAS) were applied to assess and rank alternatives. A small kindergarten in Semeliskes
(Lithuania) was selected as a case study. It is determined that most appropriate way for retrofitting of small public buildings is a one-stage
with the greatest available number of workers. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 6 p. | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Tekstas / Text | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/156173 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.source.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705813008898 | en_US |
dc.subject | multi-attribute | en_US |
dc.subject | MADM | en_US |
dc.subject | public buildings | en_US |
dc.subject | retrofit | en_US |
dc.subject | strategy | en_US |
dc.title | Multi-attribute selection of public buildings retrofits strategy | en_US |
dc.type | Konferencijos publikacija / Conference paper | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | Laisvai prieinamas / Openly available | en_US |
dcterms.accrualMethod | Rankinis pateikimas / Manual submission | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2013-05-17 | |
dcterms.license | CC BY NC ND | en_US |
dcterms.references | 21 | en_US |
dc.description.version | Taip / Yes | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Vilnius Gediminas Technical University | en_US |
dc.contributor.institution | Kaunas University of Technology | en_US |
dc.contributor.faculty | Statybos fakultetas / Faculty of Civil Engineering | en_US |
dc.contributor.faculty | Verslo vadybos fakultetas / Faculty of Business Management | en_US |
dcterms.sourcetitle | Procedia Engineering | en_US |
dc.description.volume | vol. 57 | en_US |
dc.publisher.name | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.publisher.country | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.publisher.city | Oxford | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.156 | en_US |