Rodyti trumpą aprašą

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkorupski, Jacek
dc.contributor.authorUchroński, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-31T09:04:07Z
dc.date.available2025-07-31T09:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1877-7058en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/158670
dc.description.abstractThe passenger and baggage security in airport screening system is one of the most important factors that determine air transport safety and security. It prevents objects and materials that could be used to commit an act of unlawful interference from being placed on board an aircraft. The security screening system consists of x-ray screening devices, walk-through metal detectors and specialised software. However, a key element of the security screening system is the human – the security screener (SSc). The equipment and software helps the screener to find prohibited items, but also detects and records his/her errors. The whole security control point (SCP) can be regarded as a complex socio-technical system. It's effectiveness is dependent, inter alia, on the type of x-ray devices used, a variant of SCP organization or the technical condition of the equipment, but mainly on the quality of the security screeners’ work. Special attention is paid to the types of errors and their frequency. We analyze the quantitative relationships between types of errors and also between the frequency of errors and the frequency of virtual threat images projection (TIP). This last technology is a kind of intelligent support system and at the same time verifies the screener's work. The study was based on measurements under real conditions at the Katowice-Pyrzowice International Airport. In the framework of this research two basic types of errors made by SSc were identified. The results show that the number of errors is dependent from the frequency of the stimulus, represented by TIP images. As a result, it was possible to determine the recommended frequency of threat images projections. The study is supplemented by a comparison of the screeners’ effectiveness in laboratory conditions against real conditions, while working at the security control point.en_US
dc.format.extent10 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/158603en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.source.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705816000138en_US
dc.subjectair traffic safety and securityen_US
dc.subjecthuman factorsen_US
dc.subjectpassengers and baggage screeningen_US
dc.titleA human being as a part of the security control system at the airporten_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.accrualMethodRankinis pateikimas / Manual submissionen_US
dcterms.licenseCC BY NC NDen_US
dcterms.references34en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.type.pubtypeK1a - Monografija / Monographen_US
dc.contributor.institutionWarsaw University of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.institutionUpper Silesian Aviation Groupen_US
dcterms.sourcetitleProcedia Engineeringen_US
dc.description.volumevol. 134en_US
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren_US
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.cityOxforden_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.010en_US


Šio įrašo failai

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Šis įrašas yra šioje (-se) kolekcijoje (-ose)

Rodyti trumpą aprašą

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Išskyrus atvejus, kai nurodyta kitaip, šio įrašo licencija apibrėžiama taipKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence