Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseKūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorNedevska, Ivana
dc.contributor.authorOgnjenović, Slobodan
dc.contributor.authorMurgul, Vera
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T08:53:41Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T08:53:41Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1877-7058en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/158812
dc.description.abstractAs the motorization augments in urban areas, different solutions are required, considering the traffic network. In order to adjust the urban arrangement with the need for mobility, complex process of planning and designing is required. City development contains adequate incertitude which causes difficulty during the process of planning and designing. According to this, the process of planning and designing the city infrastructure network are mutually connected and inevitable. Traffic planning is a base of successful functioning in urban areas. With adequate analysis about city development and traffic, the planning process can begin, and be followed by the designing process and building the traffic network. Analysis of capacity and level of service are necessary, in order to obtain the delay of the analyzed facilities. These analyses can be empirical and analytical. The empirical model is based on regression analysis, and the analytical model uses the gap – acceptance theory. Empirical models provide better results, but can be used in cases where few roundabouts are congested, to calibrate the model. Othewise, gap – acceptance methods are used to analyze uncongested roundabouts.en_US
dc.format.extent6 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/158656en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817319720en_US
dc.subjectroundabouten_US
dc.subjectcapacityen_US
dc.subjectlevel of serviceen_US
dc.subjectHighway Capacity Manualen_US
dc.subjectdelayen_US
dc.subjectgap – acceptanceen_US
dc.subjectplanningen_US
dc.subjectdesigningen_US
dc.titleMethodology for analyzing capacity and level of service for roundabouts with one lane (HCM 2000)en_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.accrualMethodRankinis pateikimas / Manual submissionen_US
dcterms.issued2017-05-05
dcterms.licenseCC BY NC NDen_US
dcterms.references8en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.type.pubtypeK1a - Monografija / Monographen_US
dc.contributor.institutionGEING Krebs und Kiefer– Skopjeen_US
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”en_US
dc.contributor.institutionMoscow State University of Civil Engineeringen_US
dcterms.sourcetitleProcedia Engineeringen_US
dc.description.volumevol. 187en_US
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren_US
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.publisher.cityOxforden_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.442en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Kūrybinių bendrijų licencija / Creative Commons licence