Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDagiliūtė, Renata
dc.contributor.authorLuizytė, Sigita
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-23T08:04:02Z
dc.date.available2026-04-23T08:04:02Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.isbn9789955288282en_US
dc.identifier.issn2029-7106en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/160346
dc.description.abstractGrowing demand for energy is one of the main problems causing environmental burden. As households are one of the largest energy end-users, increasing energy efficiency in the household sector can contribute significantly to the overall energy efficiency and environmental impact reduction. Renovation of old multifamily blockhouses and improvement of their thermal behaviour is one of the options to increase energy efficiency in household sector. The study aims to estimate the pros and cons of renovation as well as to identify main determinants for willingness of the households in Kaunas to invest in renovation. In overall terms 28% of final energy is consumed in Lithuanian households. Though considerable potential for energy saving is foreseen in household sector, only 720 multifamily blockhouses took part in the Renovation Program over 2005 – 2008. According to investment distribution, approximately 15% of the renovation projects were realized in Kaunas district. On the basis of larger quota sample survey 100 households from multifamily blockhouses were interviewed. Households from renovated blockhouses mainly have focused on the insulation of outer walls of the house (100%) and the roof (76.3%). Majority of the households committed to invest in blockhouse renovation because of comfortable indoor temperature (89%) and money saving (81%). Relatively older respondents (χ2=11.12, p<0.05) and those from older blockhouses (χ2=11.25, p<0.05) more often lived in renovated houses. As the main advantages these respondents indicated increased indoor temperature (93.2 %) and reduced payments for the heating (84.7%). Respondents living in not renovated blockhouses were willing to renovate it (80%), hence high prices for renovation services and materials was the main impediment for renovation.en_US
dc.format.extent5 p.en_US
dc.format.mediumTekstas / Texten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/160185en_US
dc.source.urihttp://enviro2011.vgtu.lt/Abstracts/3/128.htmlen_US
dc.subjectenergy consumptionen_US
dc.subjecthouseholdsen_US
dc.subjectrenovationen_US
dc.subjectattitudesen_US
dc.titleBlockhouse renovation: some insights from pilot survey of households in Kaunas cityen_US
dc.typeKonferencijos publikacija / Conference paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsLaisvai prieinamas / Openly availableen_US
dcterms.accrualMethodRankinis pateikimas / Manual submissionen_US
dcterms.alternativeEnergy for Buildingsen_US
dcterms.issued2011-05-20
dcterms.references20en_US
dc.description.versionTaip / Yesen_US
dc.contributor.institutionVytautas Magnus Universityen_US
dcterms.sourcetitle8th International Conference “Environmental Engineering” (ICEE-2011)en_US
dc.identifier.eisbn9789955288275en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2029-7092en_US
dc.publisher.nameVilnius Gediminas Technical Universityen_US
dc.publisher.nameVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetasen_US
dc.publisher.countryLithuaniaen_US
dc.publisher.countryLietuvaen_US
dc.publisher.cityVilniusen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record